How many minority and women cartoonists are in the LA Times?

I wrote the post below last February in my Griffith Park Blog. It’s a popular post, so I thought cartoon people would like to take a look at it here. I update it below.

I just couldn’t believe this article in the LA Times and many other papers today.

But for one day — this Sunday — nearly a dozen cartoonists of color will be drawing essentially the same comic strip, using irony to literally illustrate that point. In each strip, the artists will portray a white reader grousing about a minority-drawn strip, complaining that it’s a “Boondocks” rip-off and blaming it on “tokenism.” “It’s the one-minority rule,” says Lalo Alcaraz (”La Cucaracha”). “We’ve got one black guy and we’ve got one Latino. There’s not room for anything else.”

blondiek3
Blondie comic book cover

Let’s respect syndicates like King Features for not allowing registered and copyrighted characters and cartoons to be uploaded, I really do, but it makes my life as a comic reporter much harder. However, came across this blogger who has some very cool comic book covers for you to ogle and enjoy. Blondie is written and drawn by two men, bless their hearts.
Or, as Darrin Bell says in Tampa Bay here:

Cartoonist Darrin Bell likes to call it the “two strip rule.”

It’s the trend he’s noticed while pitching his syndicated comic strip Candorville to newspapers across the country. Most newspapers, it seems, will make room for only two strips drawn by people of color, no matter the subject.

It does seem a little unfair, although the Times goes on to point out:

Still, others argue that it’s not that simple. For one, there are demographics to consider, says Rick Newcombe, chief executive of Creators Syndicate, (Hi, Rick!) which syndicates “B.C.,” “Herb and Jamaal,” “Working It Out” and “Cafe con Leche.”

“In defense of newspaper editors,” says Newcombe, “it’s only natural to buy [comic strips] according to categories. You might have one according to sports, or one according to office etiquette or work.

And some other syndicate editors remind us if one strip is picked up, another is dropped, the paper business is hard, yada, yada.

Immediately, I go to the LA Times to count strips (as if I haven’t done this before.)      Hmm, the LA Times has three strips by cartoonists of color! The Times is ahead of the game!

And how about cartoons by women? Let’s see…two. Two strips by women, For Better or For Worse, and Cathy. Huh. Of course, there are several strips ABOUT women, but apparently women weren’t able to draw or write them. That’s peculiar…

9 Chickweed Lane – by Brooke McEldowney, a man with a girl’s name.
Sally Forth – by two men. You know, to get a woman’s “voice” just right.
Blondie – by two men. But they’re very sensitive men, I’m sure…

A dozen minority (men) cartoonists, but I can’t think of even 10 syndicated women, and this is my business. Oh, dear, [slap upside the head], how did I forget Six Chix, by King Features? It’s not in the Times, but it’s in Daily News, so, in close proximity. King Features, the syndicate that figured one woman couldn’t “carry” a panel by herself, so it takes 6 (as in Six Chix) women, all patched and stitched together, to make some kind of funny impact.

Did I make my point yet?

UPDATED TODAY!

Hmm. Nothing has changed. Oh, For Better or For Worse is on hiatus, or retirement, or retreads, whatever they’re calling it now, so they are testing Between Friends, by Sandra Bell-Lundy for a few months. So, still only 2 women, 3 cartoonists of color (see, they can’t say minority cartoonists, because that would INCLUDE women). So cartoonists of color have more power and influence.

Say, that’s just how our recent election worked out, too!

3 thoughts on “How many minority and women cartoonists are in the LA Times?”

  1. “It does seem a little unfair”

    Oh, gee, nice of you to notice it’s a LITTLE unfair. And Newcombe’s excuse is insulting and it’s proof of what the cartoonists were protesting against. As the cartoonists pointed out, “black” is not a category in the same way as “sports, office etiquette, or work.” “Black strip” isn’t any more legitimate as a category than “White strip.”

    “So, still only 2 women, 3 cartoonists of color (see, they can’t say minority cartoonists, because that would INCLUDE women). So cartoonists of color have more power and influence.”

    Uh, no. Women aren’t a “minority.” We’re more than 51% of the population.

    “Say, that’s just how our recent election worked out, too!”

    That’s only because Obama was a better candidate than Hillary Clinton. People like me found her political tactics to be disgusting. It had nothing to do with her being a woman, and it offends me when people pretend it did.

  2. So what? All the comics you just listed written by women are terrible, and the ones about women, less than that. I live with two women in my house and they don’t find “Cathy” or “For Better or For Worse” neither funny nor creative. And if you are implying that the La Times are racist by having three strips written by colored people (which is incorrect), then maybe it’s because ALL THE OTHERS AREN’T FUNNY!

  3. Lilia, it’s called irony. Or sarcasm, I forget.

    Daniel, would like to hear more from you. Am I incorrect on which are written by cartoonists of color? No, I don’t imply that the LA Times, but they do bend over to be politically correct. When cartoonists of color are involved.

    I would be interested in knowing which, if any, cartoons your women folk do find funny. I agree, the 2 you mentioned aren’t, although I read Cathy anyway, for the story line.

Comments are closed.